New York Times
Saudi Arabia Kills Civilians, the US Looks the Other Way
Saudi Arabia Kills Civilians, the US Looks the Other Way
In the span of four days earlier this month, the Saudi Arabia-led coalition in Yemen
bombed a Doctors Without Borders-supported hospital, killing 19 people;
a school, where 10 children, some as young as 8, died; and a vital
bridge over which United Nations food supplies traveled, punishing
millions.
In
a war that has seen reports of human rights violations committed by
every side, these three attacks stand out. But the Obama administration
says these strikes, like previous ones that killed thousands of
civilians since last March, will have no effect on the American support
that is crucial for Saudi Arabia’s air war.
On
the night of Aug. 11, coalition warplanes bombed the main bridge on the
road from Hodeidah, along the Red Sea coast, to Sana, the capital. When
it didn’t fully collapse, they returned the next day to destroy the
bridge.
More
than 14 million Yemenis suffer dangerous levels of food insecurity — a
figure that dwarfs that of any other country in conflict, worsened by a
Saudi-led and American-supported blockade. One in three children under
the age of 5 reportedly suffers from acute malnutrition. An estimated 90
percent of food that the United Nation’s World Food Program transports
to Sana traveled across the destroyed bridge.
An
Obama administration official told me on the condition of anonymity
that the United States included the bridge on a no-strike list of vital
infrastructure, explicitly informing the Saudis that it was “critical to
responding to the humanitarian crisis in Yemen.” And yet the Saudi-led
coalition obliterated the structure,
either intentionally disregarding humanitarian considerations and the
wishes of the United States, or out of sheer incompetence.
On
Aug. 14, coalition airstrikes hit the school in the Saada governorate, a
stronghold of the Houthi rebels. Saudi officials said the Houthis were
running a training facility there for child soldiers. The United
Nations’ child welfare agency said it was a religious school.
A
day later, warplanes attacked the hospital supported by Doctors Without
Borders, or M.S.F., for its French name, Médecins Sans Frontières. It
was the fourth coalition attack on a facility of the doctors’ group since October. At least 19 people were killed, including an M.S.F. staffer.
M.S.F.
said its hospitals’ coordinates had been shared with all parties to the
conflict, including the Saudis. The hospital should have already been
on no-strike lists that the United States and Saudi Arabia insist the
coalition maintains.
The American assistance for Saudi Arabia that Mr. Obama authorized last March
includes aerial refueling for coalition jets, intelligence and
targeting assistance. American tankers offload fuel to any coalition
jet, no matter its target. This support comes on top of more than $100
billion in arms deals with Saudi Arabia between 2010 and 2015, and
recent deals made explicitly to “replenish” stockpiles spent in Yemen.
At the United Nations, Saudi Arabia and its allies have blocked investigations into the Yemen conflict and complained when the Security Council considered a resolution aimed at protecting Yemeni civilians. Saudi Arabia has also warned aid workers
to leave much of Yemen, ominously presaging M.S.F.’s Aug. 18 decision
to pull out of two governorates in the country’s north because of the
coalition’s “indiscriminate bombings.” Without the group’s presence, it will be more difficult to know the toll of future strikes in these areas.
In
June, Saudi Arabia threatened to cut its funding to the United Nations
after Secretary General Ban Ki-moon included the coalition on a list of
violators of children’s rights. While criticizing the Saudis for their
bullying, Mr. Ban’s office has also been accommodating out of a belief
that it can’t afford to lose Saudi money.
The
Saudis are not the only negative force in Yemen. The Houthis and their
allies loyal to former President Ali Abdullah Saleh have waged a cynical
war, and are responsible for human rights violations. But it is
difficult to see what possible progress can be made when Saudi Arabia
routinely bombs civilian sites.
Many
in Washington see support for the Saudi-led coalition as necessary for
maintaining American-Saudi relations after the nuclear deal with Iran
last year. Saudi Arabia has used this leeway to carry out its Yemen
campaign with abandon. Each fatal strike and subsequent implausible
Saudi denial should test the limits of the Obama administration’s
support.
Instead,
a spokesman for United States Central Command, which oversees American
operations in the Middle East including support for the coalition, told
me last week that the United States is not conducting a single
investigation into civilian casualties in Yemen.
The
recent uptick in airstrikes and fighting across Yemen follows the
collapse of United Nations-brokered peace talks that were being held in
Kuwait. The possibility of a resumption of full-scale war and all the
suffering that accompanies it could have been an opportunity for the
Obama administration to reflect on its axiomatic support for the Saudi
coalition. But even after last week’s string of outrageous bombings, the
White House has still not done that.
\
The
Obama administration has in recent days insisted that it wants all
sides in Yemen’s war to stop fighting. But as American tankers wait to
refuel American-made fighter jets, loaded with American-made bombs
destined for Yemen, the White House evidently doesn’t realize that it is
waging a war.
No comments:
Post a Comment