Egypt Independent
As vote counting got underway
in the second and final round of Egypt's presidential election, the
Supreme Council of Armed Forces (SCAF) issued amendments to the
Constitutional Declaration that will limit the powers of the coming
president and expand the military's role, notably giving it a heavy
influence over the writing of the country's next constitution.
The amended Article 60 gives
the SCAF the power to potentially appoint a Constituent Assembly to
write the next constitution if the current assembly fails to complete
its mandate. The current assembly was elected by a Parliament that was
dissolved last week by court order. The Constituent Assembly is required
to complete its work within three months and then put its draft to a
popular referendum.
The seven provisions added to the
declaration issued by the SCAF last March were announced on Sunday in
the Official Gazette. An official told state-run MENA news agency Sunday
night that SCAF will give details about the content of the document at
9:30 am on Monday.
The SCAF, the president, the
prime minister, the Supreme Judicial Council, or one-fifth of the
Constituent Assembly have the right to contest any clause issued by the
Constituent Assembly if “it is in opposition to the goals of the
revolution or its basic principles… or the common principles of Egypt’s
past constitutions.”
The assembly would have to
revisit the contested clause or clauses within 15 days, and if the
contention holds the Supreme Constitutional Court should have the final
word.
The SCAF’s new authority over
the Constituent Assembly and its decisions follow a long stream of
deliberations over constitution writing, whereby Islamist forces tried
twice and failed to control the process by convening predominantly
Islamist assemblies.
In a further empowerment of
the Supreme Constitutional Court (SCC), an amended Article 30 rules that
the newly elected president shall swear in before the judicial body.
The Constitutional Declaration previously said that the president would
take office in front of Parliament.
Last Thursday, the SCC issued
two critical rulings that dealt a blow to Islamist forces as it deemed
the Parliamentary Elections Law unconstitutional, leading to the
dissolution of Parliament. The same day, the court ruled the Political
Isolation Law issued by Parliament unconstitutional, keeping Ahmed
Shafiq in the race.
Shafiq, a former air force
commander and toppled President Hosni Mubarak's last prime minister, is
widely viewed as the SCAF's preferred candidate. He is competing against
the Muslim Brotherhood's Mohamed Morsy.
The amended Article 56 gives
the SCAF the right to assume the responsibilities of Parliament until a
new one is elected. The previous interim constitution allowed the SCAF
to issue and overrule legislation.
Article 53 of the amended
Constitutional Declaration gives the SCAF the upper hand in running the
armed forces, while the elected president can only decide to go to war
after its approval. The president can also, with the approval of the
SCAF, call on the armed forces to contribute to rule of law and security
operations in the country alongside the police if need be.
The amendment to Article 53
retroactively provides constitutional grounds for the recent expansion
of the military's power to arrest civilians. Last week, the Justice
Ministry issued a decree that military police and military intelligence
are allowed to arrest civilians for even minor crimes. Human rights
groups had raised questions about the constitutionality of the decree.
Earlier on Sunday, Saad al-Katatny, the
former speaker of the dissolved Parliament, rejected the idea of a
complementary constitutional declaration and the decision to dissolve
Parliament, which he deemed unconstitutional, in a meeting with military
Chief of Staff Sami Anan. The Muslim Brotherhood wrote on its official
Twitter account, "As far as we are concerned, the supplemental
Constitutional Declaration released by the SCAF is null and
unconstitutiona l."
Heba Morayef, a researcher with Human
Rights Watch, wrote that while many expected the new constitutional
amendments to spell out the powers of the president, these amendments
instead expand military powers, "rendering meaningless the June 30
'handover.'"
*Photo by Tarek Wageeh
No comments:
Post a Comment